Why in news?
An analysis of company filings has shown that a few states receive the bulk of corporate social responsibility spending, while aspirational districts and underdeveloped regions remain neglected. Critics argue that CSR funds should be allocated more equitably.
Background
- Under the Companies Act 2013, certain profitable companies must spend at least 2 percent of their average net profit on social development activities. The aim is to support education, health, environment and poverty alleviation projects.
- Data from the 2022–23 fiscal year show that six states, including Maharashtra, Karnataka and Gujarat, received around 60 percent of total CSR spending. Aspirational districts, identified by NITI Aayog for focused development, received less than one‑fifth.
Reasons for imbalance
- Companies often prefer to spend locally where they have factories or offices, making monitoring easier.
- Lack of coordination and duplication of government schemes lead firms to support high‑profile causes rather than remote areas.
- There is no national mechanism to track the impact of CSR projects, so efforts may cluster in states with better reporting and infrastructure.
Impacts
- Regions that are already economically advanced benefit more, widening regional disparities.
- Neglected areas miss out on potential funds for schools, hospitals and livelihood programmes.
- Failure to invest in backward districts can hamper inclusive growth and social cohesion.
Way forward
- Regulators could encourage a minimum percentage of CSR funds to be directed to aspirational districts and under‑served areas.
- State and central agencies should map local needs and provide companies with a menu of projects aligned to government priorities.
- Regular impact assessments and transparent reporting will help identify gaps and ensure accountability.
- Collaboration between companies, non‑profits and governments can create larger, longer‑term projects that address systemic issues.
Conclusion
CSR spending has the potential to drive equitable development. Fair distribution and effective monitoring are essential to realise this potential.