Why in news?
There is a growing debate on reforming India’s bail system, which many argue is inequitable and keeps poor defendants behind bars while others go free. Recent discussions highlight the need for a coherent framework and clearer guidelines.
Background
Bail refers to the temporary release of an accused person pending trial. India’s Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 codifies some aspects of bail, but the process often depends on judicial discretion. Over three‑quarters of India’s prison inmates are undertrial prisoners, reflecting systemic issues.
Key points
- Types of bail include anticipatory bail (before arrest), regular bail (after arrest) and default bail (if investigation exceeds statutory time limits). Yet many accused remain incarcerated because they cannot afford monetary conditions or find sureties.
- High pre‑trial detention rates arise from delays in investigation and trial, misuse of preventive detention laws, and a backlog of cases. Courts sometimes deny bail without clear reasoning.
- Poor and marginalised defendants are disproportionately affected. They often lack access to legal aid, cannot provide surety bonds and are unaware of their rights.
- Reform suggestions include limiting preventive detention to exceptional cases, providing automatic bail for minor offences, setting uniform guidelines for courts, strengthening district legal services authorities to assist indigent accused, and exploring non‑custodial alternatives like community service.
Implications
- A fair bail system would reduce overcrowding in prisons and uphold the constitutional principle of personal liberty.
- Guidelines would make bail decisions more predictable and minimise arbitrariness.
- Greater awareness and legal assistance could ensure that bail is a right accessible to all, not a privilege for the affluent.