Why in news?
An Assam Civil Service officer was arrested for allegedly amassing assets hundreds of times her known sources of income. The case has ignited discussion about corruption and the need for integrity among public servants.
What is integrity in public office?
Integrity means consistently acting in accordance with moral, ethical and legal standards. A public official with integrity does not abuse power for private gain and aligns decision‑making with the public interest. The concept is rooted in several ethical traditions:
- Deontological ethics: Duty‑based ethics emphasising adherence to rules and laws.
- Utilitarianism: Choosing actions that maximise welfare for the greatest number.
- Virtue ethics: Focusing on the character traits (virtues) of honesty, courage and justice.
- Social contract theory: Viewing public office as a trust held on behalf of citizens.
Why does it matter?
- Public trust: Citizens’ confidence in government depends on the honesty of its servants.
- Service delivery: Corruption leads to leakages and poor quality of services such as healthcare, education and welfare.
- Economic growth: Countries with cleaner governance attract investment and experience higher growth.
- Rule of law: Integrity ensures fair application of laws without favouritism or discrimination.
- Moral leadership: Ethical officials set an example and shape organisational culture.
Challenges
- Weak enforcement: Anti‑corruption agencies often lack autonomy or resources.
- Opaque processes: Lack of transparency in appointments, transfers and procurements breeds favouritism.
- Political patronage: Frequent interference undermines merit‑based decisions.
- Slow trials: Cases drag on for years, reducing deterrence.
- Organised networks: Collusion between politicians, bureaucrats and contractors makes corruption systemic.
Legal framework and reforms
The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018 broadened the definition of bribery, introduced corporate liability, and mandated time‑bound trials. However, enforcement remains patchy. Additional reforms include:
- Strengthening vigilance bodies such as the Lokpal and state Lokayuktas and insulating them from political pressure.
- Publishing and updating assets and liabilities of officials online to enhance transparency.
- Instituting ethics training and value‑based education in civil services.
- Fast‑tracking corruption cases through special courts.
- Protecting whistle‑blowers and rewarding honest reporting.
Conclusion
Integrity is the soul of public service. High‑profile cases of disproportionate assets are reminders that without ethical values, even the best laws remain ineffective. India needs not only robust legal mechanisms but also a cultural shift towards honesty and accountability.