Why in news?
The term “involution” has been used to describe recent price wars in China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry, where intense competition leads companies to cut prices aggressively, undermining profitability. The concept is applicable to broader socio‑economic trends.
Origins and meaning
Derived from the Latin word involutio (meaning “to roll inward”), involution originally referred to agricultural systems that became more labour‑intensive without corresponding productivity gains. Anthropologist Clifford Geertz popularised the term in his 1963 study of Indonesian rice cultivation. In contemporary usage, it describes situations where over‑competition leads to diminishing returns and stifles innovation.
Characteristics
- Hyper‑competition: Numerous players compete fiercely for market share, often slashing prices below cost.
- Excess capacity: Industry production exceeds demand, leading to idle inventories.
- Below‑cost selling: Firms reduce margins drastically to stay afloat, eroding profits across the board.
- Trade tensions: Surpluses may be dumped in foreign markets, triggering trade disputes.
- Societal stress: Workers face longer hours and lower pay, while companies struggle to fund research.
Implications
- Industry consolidation: Smaller players may exit or merge, leaving a few dominant firms.
- Innovation slowdown: When profits shrink, investment in R&D declines.
- Global spillovers: Cheap exports flood international markets, affecting competitors in other countries.
Lessons for India
The involution phenomenon reminds policymakers that healthy competition requires supportive regulation, adequate demand and a focus on innovation. In sectors like EVs and electronics, India must avoid a race to the bottom by encouraging quality, diversification and fair pricing.