Science & Technology

Model Code of Conduct for College Teachers

Why in news — The Tamil Nadu Higher Education Department released a draft model code of conduct for college teachers in July 2025. The document sparked debate on academic freedom, teacher accountability and appropriate behaviour on campus.

Why in news?

The Tamil Nadu Higher Education Department released a draft model code of conduct for college teachers in July 2025. The document sparked debate on academic freedom, teacher accountability and appropriate behaviour on campus.

Ethics versus conduct

  • A code of ethics sets out broad principles—such as honesty, fairness and respect—that professionals should aspire to. It is aspirational and value‑based.
  • A code of conduct lays down specific rules of behaviour, including dos and don’ts in various situations. It is more prescriptive and enforceable.

Draft code highlights

  • Teacher–student boundaries: Specifies appropriate interactions, discouraging favouritism, harassment or exploitation. Teachers must avoid relationships that compromise professional integrity.
  • Classroom conduct: Encourages punctuality, preparedness and unbiased evaluation. Disparaging remarks on caste, religion or gender are prohibited.
  • Political neutrality: Teachers should not use classrooms to propagate political ideologies or canvass for any party. Participation in partisan activities on campus may require prior approval.
  • Social media use: Guidelines ask teachers to refrain from posting content that harms the institution’s reputation or discloses confidential information. They should not publicly criticise students or colleagues.
  • Research integrity: Emphasises avoiding plagiarism, properly acknowledging collaborators and managing conflicts of interest.

Implementation and limitations

  • Training and sensitisation: Institutions must conduct workshops to familiarise teachers with the code and discuss real‑life scenarios.
  • Ethics committees: Colleges should set up committees to investigate complaints, ensuring due process and natural justice.
  • Autonomy concerns: Critics worry that strict rules could stifle creativity and academic freedom, especially in social sciences and humanities.
  • Ambiguity: Vague terms like “objectionable post” may lead to inconsistent enforcement. The code must be periodically reviewed with teacher input.

Continue reading on the App

Save this article, highlight key points, and take quizzes.

App Store Google Play
Home News Subjects
```