Why in news?
In November 2025, the Delhi High Court dismissed proceedings initiated by the Lokpal of India against Rajesh Kumar Singh, the Union Commerce Secretary and chairman of the National Productivity Council (NPC). The case stemmed from complaints alleging irregular promotions within the NPC, but the court held that the promotions pre‑dated Singh’s tenure and that the Lokpal lacks jurisdiction when no corruption is alleged.
Background
The National Productivity Council was established in 1958 as an autonomous body under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). It serves as a national institution for promoting productivity across economic sectors and is a constituent of the Asian Productivity Organisation. The NPC functions as a think tank, training provider and consultancy service, supporting both government and industry.
Mandate and activities
- Advancing productivity culture: The NPC propagates the importance of productivity through awareness campaigns, research and advisory services, with an emphasis on innovation and competitiveness.
- Consultancy and training: It offers consultancy in industrial engineering, energy management, lean manufacturing and quality improvement. Training programmes build capacity in productivity techniques, project management and human resources.
- Research and awards: The Council conducts studies on productivity trends and recommends policy measures. It also recognises organisations and individuals for excellence through national productivity awards.
- International cooperation: As a member of the Asian Productivity Organisation, the NPC hosts workshops and collaborates on cross‑border initiatives to share best practices.
Delhi High Court judgment
The complaint before the Lokpal alleged that the Chairman had unduly promoted certain officials within the NPC. However, the Delhi High Court found that the promotions were approved before Singh assumed office and that there were no specific accusations of corruption. The court ruled that the Lokpal Act empowers the ombudsman to investigate cases of corruption or misconduct, not to revisit administrative decisions. Consequently the proceedings against Singh were quashed, and the court emphasised the need for vigilance against misuse of anti‑corruption mechanisms.
Conclusion
The verdict brings clarity to the scope of the Lokpal’s jurisdiction and affirms due process. For the National Productivity Council, it underscores the importance of transparent human‑resource policies. As India strives to enhance productivity for economic growth, the NPC’s role in fostering innovation and efficiency across sectors will remain vital.
Source: TP