Developing stories, updated through the day

‹ News Blitz Polity Developing

Supreme Court asks why totaliser cannot replace booth-wise vote counting

తెలుగు version is not ready yet. Showing English.

First brief 1 Sep, 18:30 IST Updated 1 Sep, 14:40 IST 2 developments 3 min read Latest ↓
The front of the Supreme Court of India building
Photo: Pinakpani / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Where it stands

On 1 September 2026 the Supreme Court heard petitions for a totaliser. A totaliser mixes the votes of about 14 booths before anyone sees the result. The bench had Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana. The Court asked the Union government to state any impediments to a totaliser. The Court also asked whether a totaliser would have any negative impact. The Court asked the Election Commission of India (ECI) to send the Union government a proposal. The Union government will take a call on that proposal. The Court did not order the use of totalisers. The Court will hear the case again after the Union government replies.

Version 1 · rewritten 1 Sep, 18:30 IST

Background

At present, counting staff count votes booth by booth. The staff press the result button on each electronic voting machine (EVM). The votes for each candidate from that booth go into Part II of Form 17C. Everyone at the counting table can then see how each booth voted. A totaliser is a device that connects a group of EVMs. The totaliser shows one combined count for the whole group. The Election Commission of India proposed totalisers in a letter dated 21 November 2008. The Law Commission of India supported the idea in the 255th Report of March 2015.

How it developed

  1. 2008 to August 2026
    How it started

    How the totaliser proposal began in 2008

    On 21 November 2008 the Election Commission of India (ECI) wrote to the Law Ministry. The ECI asked for a rule change to allow a totaliser for EVM counting. In March 2015 the Law Commission's 255th Report supported the totaliser. The Law Commission proposed a change in Rule 66A of the Conduct of Elections Rules. On 5 March 2018 the Union government told the Supreme Court about a fear of data leaks. An expert committee set up by the government did not support the proposal. The ECI later gave the Supreme Court a written statement opposing the totaliser.

  2. 1 Sep, 14:21 IST
    New fact

    Supreme Court asks why a totaliser cannot replace booth-wise counting

    On 1 September 2026 a three-judge bench heard the totaliser petitions. The bench had Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana. Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay argued for the petitioners. Upadhyay said booth-wise results expose voters to threats after the poll. Justice Bagchi said Rule 59A already allows the mixing of paper ballots. Justice Bagchi asked why the same idea cannot apply to EVMs.

  3. 1 Sep, 14:40 IST
    Official response

    ECI says a totaliser needs a change in the law. Court seeks the Union's stand.

    Senior Advocate Dama Seshadri Naidu appeared for the ECI. Naidu said the ECI supports the aim of keeping voter choice secret. Naidu said a totaliser would need changes in the law. Naidu said agents could then not check the count against Form 17C. Chief Justice Kant asked what the impediments are, if any. The Court asked the ECI to send a proposal to the Union government. The Court said the Union government shall take a call on the proposal. The Court will hear the case again after the government replies.

Why it matters for UPSC

GS2 · Elections and ECIGS2 · Judiciary

The story falls under General Studies Paper 2, elections and the Election Commission of India. The exam may test secrecy of the ballot at the counting stage. Do not confuse the Court's question with a Court order to use totalisers.

Key terms

TotaliserA totaliser is a device that joins a group of EVMs at counting time. The totaliser gives one total for the whole group. Nobody learns how any single booth in that group voted.
Booth-wise countingBooth-wise counting means counting the votes of each polling booth separately. Every candidate's agent then knows how that booth voted. A village with one booth cannot hide how the village voted.
Secrecy of the ballotSecrecy of the ballot means nobody should know how a voter voted. The voter marks the choice alone inside the booth. Booth-wise results can weaken the secrecy of the ballot in a small village.
Conduct of Elections RulesThe Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 are the detailed rules for holding elections in India. Counting of votes follows the Conduct of Elections Rules. Rule 66A covers counting where EVMs are used.
Rule 59ARule 59A is a rule for paper ballots. The ECI can order the mixing of all ballot papers of a constituency before counting. The ECI can order the mixing where the ECI fears intimidation or victimisation of voters.
Form 17CForm 17C is the record of votes for one polling booth. Part II of Form 17C lists the votes of each candidate at counting. Candidates' agents use Form 17C to check the count booth by booth.
Sources (7)
Sign in Today’s news
Current affairs Daily news Daily quiz News Blitz Shorts Economic Survey 2025-26 Subjects
Polity Economy Geography Environment History Science & Tech Intl. Relations Internal Security Art & Culture Social Issues
All subjects Exam info UPSC Syllabus Prelims syllabus Mains syllabus Exam pattern Eligibility & attempts OBC & EWS checker Resources Free downloads Booklist 2026 Previous year papers Video notes YouTube channel